FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 10

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 48. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 79% for Erling Haaland and 9.7% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.2 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £9.8m and £8.2m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Cole Palmer at 4.6 against Morgan Rogers at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 28.2% and 52.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 6.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 25. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 6 assists. Ownership sits at 21.4% for Bruno Fernandes and 46.9% for Pascal Groß, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.2 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £5.4m and £5.3m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 12.8 against Lewis Hall at 7.9. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 45.2% and 19.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 3.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 21. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 6 assists. Ownership sits at 16.5% for Martin Ødegaard and 46.9% for Pascal Groß, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.2 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £5.9m, there is a £1.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 8.6 against Riccardo Calafiori at 8.6. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.5 projected points. With ownership at 12.4% and 48% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Virgil, a gap of 4.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 4 goals and 2 assists this season; Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 35.2% for Rayan Cherki and 16.5% for Martin Ødegaard, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.2m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 7.7 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 25.8% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for James Tarkowski, a gap of 5.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while James Tarkowski is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Ezri Konsa has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 23.2% for Ezri Konsa and 19% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 9.2 expected points for Ezri Konsa.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £5.7m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 6.2 against Joško Gvardiol at 7.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 1.8 projected points. With ownership at 15.8% and 25.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Francisco Evanilson at 8.5 for Gameweek 10, against 5.0 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 3.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Francisco Evanilson has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 21.4% for Bruno Fernandes and 16.5% for Martin Ødegaard, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £4.8m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 8.6 against Ezri Konsa at 10.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 12.4% and 23.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 1.0 for Gameweek 10, against 0.5 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 0.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 21. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 22% for Alexander Isak and 9.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Igor Thiago.

|

Priced at £6.1m and £6.0m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 6.1 against Yoane Wissa at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Dominic Calvert-Lewin the edge at 3.8 projected points. With ownership at 20.7% and 9.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 10, against 4.8 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Thierno Barry edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 7.7% for Thierno Barry and 20.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Thierno Barry.

|

Priced at £6.1m and £7.4m, there is a £1.3m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 6.1 against Kai Havertz at 4.5. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Dominic Calvert-Lewin the edge at 3.8 projected points. With ownership at 20.7% and 5.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.2 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 3.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Charalampos Kostoulas leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Charalampos Kostoulas edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 5.7% for Kai Havertz and 10.2% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.2 expected points for Charalampos Kostoulas.

|