

Priced at £5.9m and £5.0m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 4.9 against Maxim De Cuyper at 7.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 28.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominik Szoboszlai has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 18% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Marc Guéhi.
|
Priced at £5.9m and £6.5m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 4.9 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 8.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 16.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 3.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.5 for Issa Diop, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 3.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Issa Diop is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 19.9% for Martin Ødegaard and 41.3% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Morgan Rogers.
|


Priced at £11.9m and £7.9m, there is a £4.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bryan Mbeumo generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.6 against Bryan Mbeumo at 3.2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 2.0 projected points. With ownership at 38.3% and 20.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominik Szoboszlai has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 22. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 31% for Pascal Groß and 20.4% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 15.5 expected points for Pascal Groß.
|
Priced at £6.8m and £5.9m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4.3 against Pascal Groß at 8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 15.5 projected points. With ownership at 19.9% and 31% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 15.5 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Morgan Gibbs-White, a gap of 10.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 15.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Morgan Gibbs-White is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 28.7% for Maxim De Cuyper and 18% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.
|


Priced at £5.0m and £6.2m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.6 against James Tarkowski at 6.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 11.0 projected points. With ownership at 28.7% and 17.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Joško Gvardiol at 7.5 for Gameweek 6, against 6.5 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Joško Gvardiol has averaged 7.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 6.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Kevin Schade leads on total points and the gap stands at 19. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 12.9% for Kevin Schade and 32% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 12.0 expected points for Kevin Schade.
|
Priced at £8.0m and £6.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Virgil generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 3.1 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 8.0 projected points. With ownership at 22.7% and 16.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Gabriel at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 1.0 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 4.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Morgan Gibbs-White leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Morgan Gibbs-White edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 15.7% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 20.4% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.
|
Priced at £6.2m and £6.5m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. James Tarkowski at 6.9 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 11.0 projected points. With ownership at 17.3% and 16.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 1.0 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 4.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 19. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 12.5% for Issa Diop and 18.3% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.5 expected points for Lewis Hall.
|


Priced at £5.6m and £6.2m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Charalampos Kostoulas at 5 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Charalampos Kostoulas the edge at 10.0 projected points. With ownership at 5.5% and 18.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Charalampos Kostoulas at 10.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 7.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Charalampos Kostoulas has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Thierno Barry edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8.5% for Thierno Barry and 4.7% for Gonzalo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Thierno Barry.
|
Priced at £5.7m and £5.5m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Emersonn generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 3.5 against Emersonn at 4.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Emersonn the edge at 7.0 projected points. With ownership at 8.5% and 3.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW6. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.








