FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 10

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 for Gameweek 10, against 5.5 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 2.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 36. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 79% for Erling Haaland and 9.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.2 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £7.9m and £8.2m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 5.6 against Morgan Rogers at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 20.3% and 52.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for James Tarkowski, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while James Tarkowski is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 14. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 48% for Riccardo Calafiori and 15.9% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £11.7m and £7.9m, there is a £3.8m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 3 against Rayan Cherki at 5.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Rayan Cherki the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 21.5% and 35.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 4.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 3.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marcus Tavernier leads on total points and the gap stands at 20. On attacking output, Marcus Tavernier edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Marcus Tavernier has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 21.5% for Bruno Fernandes and 27.9% for Marcus Tavernier, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marcus Tavernier.

|

Priced at £6.7m and £9.8m, there is a £3.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 against Cole Palmer at 4.6. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Cole Palmer the edge at 4.2 projected points. With ownership at 16.5% and 28.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 5.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marcus Tavernier leads on total points and the gap stands at 16. On attacking output, Marcus Tavernier edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Marcus Tavernier has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 16.5% for Martin Ødegaard and 27.9% for Marcus Tavernier, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marcus Tavernier.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £6.2m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 7.3 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 24.6% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 9.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for James Tarkowski, a gap of 6.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 9.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while James Tarkowski is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marcus Tavernier leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Marcus Tavernier has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.2% for Kevin Schade and 27.9% for Marcus Tavernier, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marcus Tavernier.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £6.0m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Gabriel generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 7.3 against Marc Guéhi at 6.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 24.6% and 15.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 9.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 7.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 9.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Ezri Konsa leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Ezri Konsa edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Ezri Konsa has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 23.2% for Ezri Konsa and 15% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 9.2 expected points for Ezri Konsa.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £5.3m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Lewis Hall generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 6.2 against Lewis Hall at 7.9. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Lewis Hall the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 15.9% and 19.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Kevin Schade at 1.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kevin Schade has averaged 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Nicolas Jackson leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Nicolas Jackson edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Nicolas Jackson has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.7% for Kai Havertz and 26.3% for Nicolas Jackson, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Nicolas Jackson.

|

Priced at £6.7m and £6.7m, there is a £0.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Martin Ødegaard the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 16.5% and 13.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Francisco Evanilson at 8.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.2 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 7.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Francisco Evanilson has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 20. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.7% for Kai Havertz and 21.9% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £5.8m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 7 against Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Thierno Barry the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 7.7% and 10.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 1.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|