FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 2

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Dominic Calvert-Lewin edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 30.5% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 69% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £8.5m, there is a £3.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bruno Fernandes generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 0.2 against Antoine Semenyo at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.8% and 25.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 4.0 for Gameweek 2, against 2.3 for Christos Tzolis, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Christos Tzolis has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 1 assists this season; Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 40.4% for Riccardo Calafiori and 29.6% for Gabriel, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £7.5m, there is a £4.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Florian Wirtz generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 0.2 against Florian Wirtz at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.8% and 12.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 2.5 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Milan van Ewijk, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 9.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Milan van Ewijk is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Iliman Ndiaye leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Iliman Ndiaye edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Iliman Ndiaye has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 37.8% for Bryan Mbeumo and 16% for Iliman Ndiaye, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.

|

Priced at £8.5m and £6.5m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Christos Tzolis generates more points per million this season. Antoine Semenyo at 0.2 against Christos Tzolis at 0.9. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 2.9 projected points. With ownership at 25.9% and 25.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 2.9 for Gameweek 2, against 2.6 for Morgan Rogers, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Antoine Semenyo has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Morgan Rogers is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Christos Tzolis leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Christos Tzolis edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Morgan Rogers has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Christos Tzolis has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 24.3% for Morgan Rogers and 25.4% for Christos Tzolis, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.6 expected points for Morgan Rogers.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £9.0m, there is a £3.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 0.2 against Alexander Isak at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 2.7 projected points. With ownership at 30.5% and 17% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 4.0 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Milan van Ewijk, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Milan van Ewijk is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Declan Rice leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Declan Rice edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Declan Rice has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.9% for Declan Rice and 24.3% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.6 expected points for Declan Rice.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £4.5m, there is a £3.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Gabriel generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 0.6 against Ezri Konsa at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 29.6% and 12.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 2.9 for Gameweek 2, against 2.2 for Iliman Ndiaye, a gap of 0.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Iliman Ndiaye has averaged 9.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14% for Pascal Groß and 25.9% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.9 expected points for Antoine Semenyo.

|

Priced at £4.0m and £6.0m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Issa Diop at 0.5 against Marc Guéhi at 1.7. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 18.1% and 17.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Declan Rice at 2.6 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Pascal Groß, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Declan Rice has averaged 3.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Pascal Groß is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Harry Maguire leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Harry Maguire edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Harry Maguire has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Milan van Ewijk has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.9% for Harry Maguire and 13.6% for Milan van Ewijk, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.2 expected points for Harry Maguire.

|

Priced at £5.5m and £7.5m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 0.4 against Florian Wirtz at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Florian Wirtz the edge at 2.6 projected points. With ownership at 14% and 12.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Igor Thiago at 2.5 for Gameweek 2, against 2.4 for Viktor Gyökeres, a gap of 0.1 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Viktor Gyökeres has averaged 0.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Jonah Kusi-Asare has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17% for Alexander Isak and 7.4% for Jonah Kusi-Asare, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.7 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £7.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 0.3 against Viktor Gyökeres at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Viktor Gyökeres the edge at 2.4 projected points. With ownership at 13.9% and 8.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Kai Havertz at 2.4 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Brian Brobbey is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Viktor Gyökeres leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Viktor Gyökeres edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Viktor Gyökeres has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Ollie Watkins has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8.4% for Viktor Gyökeres and 10.1% for Ollie Watkins, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Ollie Watkins.

|