FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 10

The expected points model has Nicolas Jackson at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 7.2 for Erling Haaland, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Nicolas Jackson has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Erling Haaland is averaging 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 79% for Erling Haaland and 21.9% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.2 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £5.9m and £5.4m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 8.6 against Maxim De Cuyper at 12.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 48% and 45.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.2 for Gameweek 10, against 5.5 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 29. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.7% for Thierno Barry and 79% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.2 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £8.2m and £6.6m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Marcus Tavernier generates more points per million this season. Morgan Rogers at 6.1 against Marcus Tavernier at 8.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Marcus Tavernier the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 52.6% and 27.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 9.2 for Gameweek 10, against 5.5 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 3.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 9.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 48% for Riccardo Calafiori and 19.8% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £5.4m and £6.0m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 12.8 against Marc Guéhi at 6.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 45.2% and 15.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 6.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 4 goals and 2 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 35.3% for Rayan Cherki and 14.2% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.

|

Priced at £9.2m and £7.0m, there is a £2.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Nicolas Jackson generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 5.8 against Nicolas Jackson at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Nicolas Jackson the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 21.9% and 26.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 9.2 for Gameweek 10, against 8.2 for Gabriel, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 9.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Francisco Evanilson leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Francisco Evanilson edges the combined goals and assists count with 8 direct contributions. Francisco Evanilson has 4 goals and 4 assists this season; Nicolas Jackson has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.4% for Francisco Evanilson and 26.3% for Nicolas Jackson, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Francisco Evanilson.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £6.2m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 7.3 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 24.6% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 9.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for James Tarkowski, a gap of 6.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 9.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while James Tarkowski is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bryan Mbeumo leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 4 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 16.5% for Martin Ødegaard and 20.3% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £4.8m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 8.6 against Ezri Konsa at 10.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 12.4% and 23.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 10, against 4.2 for Charalampos Kostoulas, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Charalampos Kostoulas is averaging 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 12.4% for Semi Ajayi and 19% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £6.4m and £6.0m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Francisco Evanilson generates more points per million this season. Francisco Evanilson at 8.1 against Yoane Wissa at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Francisco Evanilson the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 18.4% and 9.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Francisco Evanilson at 8.5 for Gameweek 10, against 4.8 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 3.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Francisco Evanilson has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Francisco Evanilson leads on total points and the gap stands at 19. On attacking output, Francisco Evanilson edges the combined goals and assists count with 8 direct contributions. Francisco Evanilson has 4 goals and 4 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.4% for Francisco Evanilson and 5.7% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Francisco Evanilson.

|

Priced at £7.4m and £5.8m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 4.5 against Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Charalampos Kostoulas the edge at 4.2 projected points. With ownership at 5.7% and 10.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Igor Thiago at 5.5 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Igor Thiago has averaged 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|