FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Priced at £15.6m and £7.8m, there is a £7.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 2.5 against Igor Thiago at 1.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 73.5% and 9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.8 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 3.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 50.6% for Riccardo Calafiori and 26.7% for Maxim De Cuyper, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.6 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £15.6m, there is a £9.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2.3 against Erling Haaland at 2.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 3.8% and 73.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 50.6% for Riccardo Calafiori and 18.4% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marc Guéhi.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £6.1m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 5 against James Tarkowski at 7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 8.6 projected points. With ownership at 50.6% and 15.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Semi Ajayi at 5.4 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Semi Ajayi has averaged 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Cole Palmer leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 2 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 26.6% for Cole Palmer and 33.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Cole Palmer.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £7.0m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 8.1 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 9.4 projected points. With ownership at 26.5% and 33.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for Morgan Rogers, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Antoine Semenyo has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Morgan Rogers is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 19.9% for Martin Ødegaard and 26.6% for Cole Palmer, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Cole Palmer.

|

Priced at £4.9m and £4.6m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 against Ezri Konsa at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.6 projected points. With ownership at 26.7% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 6.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Morgan Gibbs-White, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 6.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Morgan Gibbs-White is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 28.1% for Rayan Cherki and 15.1% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.

|

Priced at £4.9m and £6.5m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.6 projected points. With ownership at 26.7% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Cole Palmer, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Antoine Semenyo has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Cole Palmer is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 14. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 26.5% for Pascal Groß and 15.1% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 9.4 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £9.1m and £6.2m, there is a £2.9m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 3.6 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 22.1% and 18.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 6.2 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 3.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 31. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 19.4% for Ezri Konsa and 15.4% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 8.6 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £4.6m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.4 against Ezri Konsa at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Semi Ajayi the edge at 5.4 projected points. With ownership at 14.2% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 8.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Virgil, a gap of 3.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 8.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 4 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 6.4% for Brian Brobbey and 22.1% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £7.8m and £6.2m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Yoane Wissa generates more points per million this season. Igor Thiago at 1.3 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Yoane Wissa the edge at 3.0 projected points. With ownership at 9% and 18.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|