The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 9.5 for Gameweek 8, against 4.5 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 9.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 4.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 4 goals and 2 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 4 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 38.3% for Rayan Cherki and 48.5% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 8, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Morgan Rogers.
|


Priced at £6.0m and £5.3m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 7.3 against Lewis Hall at 6.6. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 7.5 projected points. With ownership at 54.1% and 20.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 7.5 for Gameweek 8, against 6.5 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 7.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 6.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 54.1% for Riccardo Calafiori and 15.2% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 8, the model projects 7.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.
|
Priced at £6.8m and £6.2m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4.9 against Pascal Groß at 9.4. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 5.5 projected points. With ownership at 18.5% and 45.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 10.5 for Gameweek 8, against 2.0 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 8.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 10.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 6 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 45.7% for Pascal Groß and 14.2% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 8, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Pascal Groß.
|
Priced at £8.0m and £6.2m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Kevin Schade generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 5.5 against Kevin Schade at 6.5. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Rayan Cherki the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 38.3% and 14.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 5.0 for Gameweek 8, against 1.0 for Morgan Gibbs-White, a gap of 4.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Morgan Gibbs-White is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Bryan Mbeumo leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 4 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 28.3% for Bruno Fernandes and 20.8% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 8, the model projects 8.0 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.
|


Priced at £11.8m and £6.8m, there is a £5.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.8 against Martin Ødegaard at 4.9. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Martin Ødegaard the edge at 2.0 projected points. With ownership at 28.3% and 18.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 1.0 for Gameweek 8, against 1.0 for Morgan Gibbs-White, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Morgan Gibbs-White is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Cole Palmer leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 11.5% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 27% for Cole Palmer, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 8, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Cole Palmer.
|
Priced at £9.7m and £7.3m, there is a £2.4m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Declan Rice generates more points per million this season. Cole Palmer at 3.9 against Declan Rice at 4.9. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Declan Rice the edge at 8.0 projected points. With ownership at 27% and 11.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 6.5 for Gameweek 8, against 2.0 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 4.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 6.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 21. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 18% for Ezri Konsa and 18.3% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 8, the model projects 6.5 expected points for Ezri Konsa.
|


Priced at £6.8m and £6.2m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Kevin Schade generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4.9 against Kevin Schade at 6.5. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Martin Ødegaard the edge at 2.0 projected points. With ownership at 18.5% and 14.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 6.5 for Gameweek 8, against 1.5 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 6.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 24. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 5 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 13.3% for Alexander Isak and 8.8% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 8, the model projects 4.5 expected points for Alexander Isak.
|


Priced at £5.7m and £5.7m, there is a £0.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 4.9 against Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.2. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Charalampos Kostoulas the edge at 6.5 projected points. With ownership at 8.2% and 9.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.0 for Gameweek 8, against 4.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Charalampos Kostoulas leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Charalampos Kostoulas edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 6.8% for Gonzalo and 9.9% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 8, the model projects 6.5 expected points for Charalampos Kostoulas.
|
Priced at £6.1m and £7.8m, there is a £1.7m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Gonzalo generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 3 against Igor Thiago at 2.3. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 6.8% and 8.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.0 for Gameweek 8, against 2.0 for Gonzalo, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW8. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.









