FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 3.4 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 3.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 19. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 4 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.9% for Thierno Barry and 73.3% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £15.6m, there is a £9.9m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 1.2 against Erling Haaland at 2.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 5.4% and 73.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Rayan Cherki has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 39.9% for Bruno Fernandes and 28% for Rayan Cherki, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £6.8m and £7.7m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4 against Morgan Rogers at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 20.1% and 40% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 4.6 for Gameweek 6, against 3.6 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 4.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 3.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 40% for Morgan Rogers and 14.7% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Morgan Rogers.

|

Priced at £6.8m and £7.0m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Martin Ødegaard the edge at 5.4 projected points. With ownership at 20.1% and 34.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 25.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 25.9% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £5.7m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 4.3 against Joško Gvardiol at 5.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 18.6% and 25.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 6.4 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 6.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 16. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.9% for Joško Gvardiol and 16.4% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £4.6m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 4.3 against Ezri Konsa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 18.6% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Morgan Gibbs-White, a gap of 1.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Morgan Gibbs-White is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 18.6% for Marc Guéhi and 14.9% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Marc Guéhi.

|

Priced at £4.6m and £6.1m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 2.4 against James Tarkowski at 4.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 19.4% and 14.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Gibbs-White at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Gibbs-White has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8.5% for Kai Havertz and 21.9% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £5.2m and £6.1m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Lewis Hall at 3.5 against James Tarkowski at 4.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 14.9% and 14.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Yoane Wissa at 3.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Yoane Wissa has averaged 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 8.5% for Kai Havertz and 19.3% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.4 expected points for Kai Havertz.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Igor Thiago the clear short-term pick. Igor Thiago carries 2.0 expected points and 2.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

The expected points model has Igor Thiago at 2.0 for Gameweek 6, against 1.4 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Igor Thiago has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Brian Brobbey is averaging 1.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|