FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 10

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.2 for Gameweek 10, against 5.0 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 2.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 79% for Erling Haaland and 10.2% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.2 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £15.8m and £7.4m, there is a £8.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 4.3 against Kai Havertz at 4.5. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.2 projected points. With ownership at 79% and 5.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 4.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 48% for Riccardo Calafiori and 23.2% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 9.2 expected points for Ezri Konsa.

|

Priced at £5.9m and £6.2m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 8.6 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.5 projected points. With ownership at 48% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 6.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 30. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 2 goals and 4 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 45.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 15% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £5.4m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 8.6 against Maxim De Cuyper at 12.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 12.4% and 45.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marcus Tavernier leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Cole Palmer has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Marcus Tavernier has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 28.1% for Cole Palmer and 27.9% for Marcus Tavernier, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marcus Tavernier.

|

Priced at £7.9m and £6.7m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 5.7 against Martin Ødegaard at 5.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Rayan Cherki the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 35.2% and 16.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.5 for Kevin Schade, a gap of 1.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kevin Schade is averaging 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Ezri Konsa leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.9% for Joško Gvardiol and 23.2% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 9.2 expected points for Ezri Konsa.

|

Priced at £6.7m and £9.8m, there is a £3.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 against Cole Palmer at 4.6. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Cole Palmer the edge at 4.2 projected points. With ownership at 16.5% and 28.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 9.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for James Tarkowski, a gap of 6.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 9.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while James Tarkowski is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marcus Tavernier leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Marcus Tavernier has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.2% for Kevin Schade and 27.9% for Marcus Tavernier, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marcus Tavernier.

|

Priced at £11.7m and £6.7m, there is a £5.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Dominik Szoboszlai generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 3 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 1.0 projected points. With ownership at 21.5% and 13.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.2 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 3.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 14. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.7% for Thierno Barry and 21.9% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £6.0m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 8.6 against Marc Guéhi at 6.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Semi Ajayi the edge at 2.2 projected points. With ownership at 12.4% and 15.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Francisco Evanilson at 8.5 for Gameweek 10, against 5.5 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Francisco Evanilson has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Charalampos Kostoulas leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Charalampos Kostoulas edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 7.7% for Thierno Barry and 10.2% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Thierno Barry.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £7.8m, there is a £2.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 7 against Igor Thiago at 4.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 5.5 projected points. With ownership at 7.7% and 9.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 1.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|