FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 2

Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 13.9% for Brian Brobbey and 69% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £7.5m and £8.0m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, João Pedro generates more points per million this season. João Pedro at 0 against Igor Thiago at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 64% and 17.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 2.8 for Gameweek 2, against 2.5 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominik Szoboszlai has averaged 8.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; João Pedro has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 13.9% for Brian Brobbey and 64% for João Pedro, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.4 expected points for João Pedro.

|

Priced at £7.5m and £15.5m, there is a £8.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Viktor Gyökeres at 0 against Erling Haaland at 0.1. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 8.4% and 69% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 4.0 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Jonah Kusi-Asare, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Jonah Kusi-Asare is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 1 assists this season; Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 40.4% for Riccardo Calafiori and 29.6% for Gabriel, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £7.5m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bryan Mbeumo generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 0.3 against Morgan Rogers at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 37.8% and 24.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 2.5 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Issa Diop, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 9.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Issa Diop is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Declan Rice leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Declan Rice has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 37.8% for Bryan Mbeumo and 17.9% for Declan Rice, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.

|

Priced at £7.5m and £6.5m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Christos Tzolis generates more points per million this season. Morgan Rogers at 0 against Christos Tzolis at 0.9. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 2.6 projected points. With ownership at 24.3% and 25.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 2.7 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, a gap of 0.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Dominic Calvert-Lewin is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 29.6% for Gabriel and 17.6% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £7.5m and £8.5m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Declan Rice generates more points per million this season. Declan Rice at 0.4 against Antoine Semenyo at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 2.9 projected points. With ownership at 17.9% and 25.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Declan Rice at 2.6 for Gameweek 2, against 2.3 for Christos Tzolis, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Christos Tzolis has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Declan Rice is averaging 3.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Iliman Ndiaye leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Iliman Ndiaye edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Iliman Ndiaye has 0 goals and 1 assists this season; Christos Tzolis has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 16% for Iliman Ndiaye and 25.4% for Christos Tzolis, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.3 expected points for Christos Tzolis.

|

Priced at £4.0m and £6.5m, there is a £2.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Issa Diop generates more points per million this season. Issa Diop at 0.5 against Nico O'Reilly at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Nico O'Reilly the edge at 3.1 projected points. With ownership at 18.1% and 21.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Luke Shaw at 1.7 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Issa Diop, a gap of 0.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Issa Diop has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Luke Shaw is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 30.5% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 6.3% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.4 expected points for Kai Havertz.

|

Priced at £4.0m and £4.5m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Issa Diop generates more points per million this season. Issa Diop at 0.5 against Ezri Konsa at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 1.7 projected points. With ownership at 18.1% and 12.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 2.8 for Gameweek 2, against 1.7 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 1.1 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Jonah Kusi-Asare leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Jonah Kusi-Asare edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Jonah Kusi-Asare has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.4% for Jonah Kusi-Asare and 17.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Igor Thiago.

|

Priced at £9.0m and £4.5m, there is a £4.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 0.2 against Jonah Kusi-Asare at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 2.7 projected points. With ownership at 17% and 7.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 2.7 for Gameweek 2, against 2.4 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Viktor Gyökeres leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Viktor Gyökeres edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Viktor Gyökeres has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Ollie Watkins has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8.4% for Viktor Gyökeres and 10.1% for Ollie Watkins, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Ollie Watkins.

|