FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 2

Across the season, Dominik Szoboszlai leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Dominik Szoboszlai edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 50.8% for Bruno Fernandes and 42% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £8.0m, there is a £4.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bryan Mbeumo generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 0.2 against Bryan Mbeumo at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.8% and 37.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 4.0 for Gameweek 2, against 2.3 for Christos Tzolis, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Christos Tzolis has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Declan Rice leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Declan Rice has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 50.8% for Bruno Fernandes and 17.9% for Declan Rice, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £6.0m, there is a £6.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Iliman Ndiaye generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 0.2 against Iliman Ndiaye at 1.5. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.8% and 16% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 2.9 for Gameweek 2, against 2.8 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.1 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Florian Wirtz has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 50.8% for Bruno Fernandes and 12.6% for Florian Wirtz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £7.5m and £7.0m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Dominik Szoboszlai generates more points per million this season. Declan Rice at 0.4 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 1.1. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Declan Rice the edge at 2.6 projected points. With ownership at 17.9% and 42% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 2.5 for Gameweek 2, against 2.2 for Harry Maguire, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 9.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Harry Maguire is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 1 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 40.4% for Riccardo Calafiori and 12.3% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £8.5m and £6.5m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Christos Tzolis generates more points per million this season. Antoine Semenyo at 0.2 against Christos Tzolis at 0.9. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 2.9 projected points. With ownership at 25.9% and 25.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 2.8 for Gameweek 2, against 2.6 for Florian Wirtz, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Florian Wirtz is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 13.9% for Brian Brobbey and 30.5% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.0 expected points for Brian Brobbey.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £4.0m, there is a £4.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Gabriel generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 0.6 against Milan van Ewijk at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 29.6% and 13.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Declan Rice at 2.6 for Gameweek 2, against 2.6 for Morgan Rogers, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Declan Rice has averaged 3.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Morgan Rogers is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Issa Diop leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Issa Diop edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Luke Shaw has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.1% for Issa Diop and 20.8% for Luke Shaw, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 1.7 expected points for Luke Shaw.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £7.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 0.2 against Viktor Gyökeres at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Viktor Gyökeres the edge at 2.4 projected points. With ownership at 30.5% and 8.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Harry Maguire at 2.2 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Issa Diop, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Issa Diop has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Harry Maguire is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.1% for Issa Diop and 17.6% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Marc Guéhi.

|

Priced at £5.5m and £7.5m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 0.4 against Declan Rice at 0.4. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Declan Rice the edge at 2.6 projected points. With ownership at 14% and 17.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Issa Diop at 1.0 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Milan van Ewijk, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Issa Diop has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Milan van Ewijk is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 13.9% for Brian Brobbey and 17% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.7 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £8.0m, there is a £0.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Igor Thiago generates more points per million this season. Igor Thiago at 0 against Ollie Watkins at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 17.2% and 10.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Kai Havertz at 2.4 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Brian Brobbey is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Viktor Gyökeres leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Viktor Gyökeres edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Viktor Gyökeres has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Jonah Kusi-Asare has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8.4% for Viktor Gyökeres and 7.4% for Jonah Kusi-Asare, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.4 expected points for Viktor Gyökeres.

|