FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 73.3% for Erling Haaland and 21.9% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £15.6m and £7.8m, there is a £7.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 2.1 against Igor Thiago at 1.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 73.3% and 8.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 6.4 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 6.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 16.4% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £7.8m and £7.0m, there is a £0.8m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 3.3 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Rayan Cherki the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 28% and 34.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 4.6 for Gameweek 6, against 3.6 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 4.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 3.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 39.9% for Bruno Fernandes and 14.7% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £4.9m and £5.7m, there is a £0.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 6.5 against Joško Gvardiol at 5.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 25.2% and 25.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Gibbs-White at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 3.6 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Gibbs-White has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 3.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 23.1% for Gabriel and 25.9% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £4.6m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 5.8 against Ezri Konsa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 25.9% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Joško Gvardiol at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 1.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Joško Gvardiol has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 2 goals and 2 assists this season; Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 28% for Rayan Cherki and 16% for Morgan Gibbs-White, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Rayan Cherki.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £7.9m, there is a £2.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 5.8 against Bryan Mbeumo at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 21.5% and 21.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Joško Gvardiol at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 3.4 for Virgil, a gap of 3.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Joško Gvardiol has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 3.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 17. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 2 goals and 3 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 21.5% for Pascal Groß and 14.7% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £6.8m and £8.4m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4 against Antoine Semenyo at 1.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Martin Ødegaard the edge at 5.4 projected points. With ownership at 20.1% and 14.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 4.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.4 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 19.4% for Ezri Konsa and 14.1% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £6.1m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 4.3 against James Tarkowski at 4.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 18.6% and 14.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Dominic Calvert-Lewin the clear short-term pick. Dominic Calvert-Lewin carries 4.0 expected points and 4.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Lewis Hall has 0 goals and 1 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.9% for Lewis Hall and 16.4% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.6 expected points for Lewis Hall.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £5.2m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.2 against Lewis Hall at 3.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Semi Ajayi the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 14.3% and 14.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Kai Havertz at 3.4 for Gameweek 6, against 1.4 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 3.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Brian Brobbey is averaging 1.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Thierno Barry edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.9% for Thierno Barry and 5.4% for Brian Brobbey, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Thierno Barry.

|