The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.8 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 4.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 39% for Bruno Fernandes and 40.2% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.2 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.
|


Priced at £5.8m and £5.7m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 5 against Joško Gvardiol at 6.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.4 projected points. With ownership at 50.6% and 26.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 26.5% for Pascal Groß and 40.2% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 9.4 expected points for Pascal Groß.
|


Priced at £9.7m and £7.0m, there is a £2.7m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Cole Palmer generates more points per million this season. Cole Palmer at 2.9 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Cole Palmer the edge at 5.6 projected points. With ownership at 26.6% and 33.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 6.2 for Gameweek 6, against 4.5 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 4.5 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 39% for Bruno Fernandes and 15.8% for Morgan Gibbs-White, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.2 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.
|
Priced at £7.8m and £9.7m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 4.4 against Cole Palmer at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Rayan Cherki the edge at 6.8 projected points. With ownership at 28.1% and 26.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 6.2 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Antoine Semenyo has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Morgan Gibbs-White leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Morgan Gibbs-White edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 15.8% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 33.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.
|


Priced at £8.4m and £7.0m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Antoine Semenyo generates more points per million this season. Antoine Semenyo at 3.9 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 15.1% and 33.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Virgil, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Morgan Gibbs-White leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 15.8% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 26.6% for Cole Palmer, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.
|


Priced at £5.7m and £6.1m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 6.5 against James Tarkowski at 7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 8.6 projected points. With ownership at 26.4% and 15.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 8.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Gabriel, a gap of 3.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 8.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Morgan Gibbs-White edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 19.9% for Martin Ødegaard and 15.8% for Morgan Gibbs-White, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.
|
Priced at £4.6m and £6.1m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 2.6 against James Tarkowski at 7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 8.6 projected points. With ownership at 19.4% and 15.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 6.2 for Gameweek 6, against 6.0 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Yoane Wissa leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Yoane Wissa edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 9% for Igor Thiago and 18.8% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.0 expected points for Yoane Wissa.
|
Priced at £5.7m and £6.2m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 4.2 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Brian Brobbey the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 6.4% and 18.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Yoane Wissa the clear short-term pick. Yoane Wissa carries 3.0 expected points and 3.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|


Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Igor Thiago the clear short-term pick. Igor Thiago carries 2.0 expected points and 2.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £7.6m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2.3 against Kai Havertz at 2.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kai Havertz the edge at 3.2 projected points. With ownership at 3.8% and 8.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.8 for Gonzalo, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW6. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.











