

Priced at £15.8m and £7.0m, there is a £8.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Nicolas Jackson generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 4.3 against Nicolas Jackson at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Nicolas Jackson the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 79% and 26.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.2 for Gameweek 10, against 3.2 for Pascal Groß, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Pascal Groß is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 29. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.7% for Thierno Barry and 79% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.2 expected points for Erling Haaland.
|


Priced at £5.9m and £5.3m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 8.6 against Lewis Hall at 7.9. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.5 projected points. With ownership at 48% and 19.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Virgil, a gap of 4.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 33. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Maxim De Cuyper has 2 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 12.4% for Semi Ajayi and 45.2% for Maxim De Cuyper, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.
|
Priced at £8.0m and £5.7m, there is a £2.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 7.3 against Joško Gvardiol at 7.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 24.6% and 25.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Nicolas Jackson at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 5.0 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 3.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Nicolas Jackson has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Nicolas Jackson leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Nicolas Jackson edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Nicolas Jackson has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 20.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 26.3% for Nicolas Jackson, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Nicolas Jackson.
|
Priced at £8.0m and £5.3m, there is a £2.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Lewis Hall generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 7.3 against Lewis Hall at 7.9. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 24.6% and 19.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for James Tarkowski, a gap of 5.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while James Tarkowski is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Ezri Konsa has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 23.2% for Ezri Konsa and 19% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 9.2 expected points for Ezri Konsa.
|


Priced at £6.2m and £6.6m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Marcus Tavernier generates more points per million this season. Kevin Schade at 7.3 against Marcus Tavernier at 8.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Marcus Tavernier the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 14.2% and 27.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Francisco Evanilson at 8.5 for Gameweek 10, against 5.0 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 3.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Francisco Evanilson has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Ezri Konsa leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 15.9% for Marc Guéhi and 23.2% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 9.2 expected points for Ezri Konsa.
|
Priced at £4.8m and £6.4m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 10.2 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 23.2% and 15% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.2 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 6.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 2.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Charalampos Kostoulas leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Charalampos Kostoulas edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Nicolas Jackson has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 10.2% for Charalampos Kostoulas and 26.3% for Nicolas Jackson, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Nicolas Jackson.
|


Priced at £11.7m and £6.7m, there is a £5.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Dominik Szoboszlai generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 3 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 1.0 projected points. With ownership at 21.5% and 13.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Virgil at 3.5 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for James Tarkowski, a gap of 0.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Virgil has averaged 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while James Tarkowski is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 12.4% for Semi Ajayi and 19% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for James Tarkowski.
|


Priced at £5.6m and £6.1m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 7 against Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Thierno Barry the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 7.7% and 20.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Francisco Evanilson at 8.5 for Gameweek 10, against 5.5 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Francisco Evanilson has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 20. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.7% for Kai Havertz and 21.9% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.
|


Priced at £6.1m and £7.4m, there is a £1.3m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 6.1 against Kai Havertz at 4.5. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Dominic Calvert-Lewin the edge at 3.8 projected points. With ownership at 20.7% and 5.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW10. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.









