FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 39.9% for Bruno Fernandes and 34.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £7.8m and £7.7m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 3.3 against Morgan Rogers at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 28% and 40% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Rayan Cherki, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Rayan Cherki is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 14.9% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £6.1m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 4.8 against James Tarkowski at 4.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 14.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Morgan Gibbs-White, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Morgan Gibbs-White is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Martin Ødegaard edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 20.1% for Martin Ødegaard and 34.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.4 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.

|

Priced at £7.8m and £5.7m, there is a £2.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 3.3 against Pascal Groß at 5.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 28% and 21.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.6 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 23.1% for Gabriel, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.4 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £7.8m and £6.8m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 3.3 against Martin Ødegaard at 4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Martin Ødegaard the edge at 5.4 projected points. With ownership at 28% and 20.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 6.4 for Gameweek 6, against 2.2 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 4.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 6.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 2.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 18.6% for Marc Guéhi and 25.9% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £6.8m and £5.7m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4 against Pascal Groß at 5.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 20.1% and 21.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Gibbs-White at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 4.6 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Gibbs-White has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Martin Ødegaard edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 20.1% for Martin Ødegaard and 14.7% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.4 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.

|

Priced at £4.6m and £6.1m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 2.4 against James Tarkowski at 4.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 19.4% and 14.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.4 for Gonzalo, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Yoane Wissa leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Yoane Wissa edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 5.4% for Brian Brobbey and 19.3% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.0 expected points for Yoane Wissa.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £6.2m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Yoane Wissa generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Yoane Wissa the edge at 3.0 projected points. With ownership at 3.7% and 19.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Kai Havertz at 3.4 for Gameweek 6, against 2.8 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 3.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Igor Thiago leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Igor Thiago edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.4% for Brian Brobbey and 8.9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 2.0 expected points for Igor Thiago.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £7.8m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Gonzalo generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2 against Igor Thiago at 1.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Gonzalo the edge at 2.4 projected points. With ownership at 3.7% and 8.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gonzalo at 2.4 for Gameweek 6, against 1.4 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gonzalo has averaged 2.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Brian Brobbey is averaging 1.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|