FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 10

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 16. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Francisco Evanilson has 4 goals and 4 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.8% for Francisco Evanilson and 79% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Francisco Evanilson.

|

Priced at £15.8m and £5.8m, there is a £10.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 4.3 against Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.2 projected points. With ownership at 79% and 10.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.2 for Gameweek 10, against 5.5 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 6 assists this season; Marcus Tavernier has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 46.9% for Pascal Groß and 27.5% for Marcus Tavernier, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marcus Tavernier.

|

Priced at £7.9m and £8.1m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 5.6 against Morgan Rogers at 6.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 20.5% and 52.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.5 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 2.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 47.9% for Riccardo Calafiori and 18.9% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £8.1m and £6.2m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Kevin Schade generates more points per million this season. Morgan Rogers at 6.2 against Kevin Schade at 7.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 52.4% and 14.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for James Tarkowski, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while James Tarkowski is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 12.5% for Semi Ajayi and 47.9% for Riccardo Calafiori, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £7.9m and £7.9m, there is a £0.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 5.7 against Bryan Mbeumo at 5.6. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 35.6% and 20.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 4.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 3.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 4 goals and 2 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 35.6% for Rayan Cherki and 13.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £4.7m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 7.7 against Ezri Konsa at 10.4. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 26% and 22.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Nicolas Jackson at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 5.0 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 3.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Nicolas Jackson has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Cole Palmer leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Cole Palmer has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 28% for Cole Palmer and 14.3% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.2 expected points for Cole Palmer.

|

Priced at £4.7m and £6.2m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 10.4 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 22.9% and 18.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marcus Tavernier at 6.0 for Gameweek 10, against 1.5 for Kevin Schade, a gap of 4.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marcus Tavernier has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kevin Schade is averaging 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Ezri Konsa leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 16% for Marc Guéhi and 22.9% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 9.2 expected points for Ezri Konsa.

|

Priced at £11.7m and £6.7m, there is a £5.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 3 against Martin Ødegaard at 5.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Martin Ødegaard the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 21.6% and 16.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Virgil at 3.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Virgil has averaged 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kevin Schade leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 16.6% for Martin Ødegaard and 14.3% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.

|

Priced at £9.2m and £7.8m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 5.8 against Igor Thiago at 4.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 5.5 projected points. With ownership at 21.6% and 9.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Francisco Evanilson at 8.5 for Gameweek 10, against 5.5 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Francisco Evanilson has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Igor Thiago edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 7.6% for Thierno Barry and 9.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Igor Thiago.

|