The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.2 for Gameweek 10, against 3.2 for Pascal Groß, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Pascal Groß is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 4 goals and 2 assists this season; Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 6 assists. Ownership sits at 35.6% for Rayan Cherki and 46.9% for Pascal Groß, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.2 expected points for Pascal Groß.
|
Priced at £7.9m and £8.1m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 5.6 against Morgan Rogers at 6.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 20.5% and 52.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 3.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 2.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 3.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 20. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 2 goals and 4 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 44.9% for Maxim De Cuyper and 22.9% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 9.2 expected points for Ezri Konsa.
|


Priced at £5.9m and £6.0m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 8.6 against Marc Guéhi at 6.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.5 projected points. With ownership at 47.9% and 16% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for James Tarkowski, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while James Tarkowski is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 21. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 6 assists. Ownership sits at 16.6% for Martin Ødegaard and 46.9% for Pascal Groß, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.2 expected points for Pascal Groß.
|


Priced at £6.2m and £6.7m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 9.7 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 3.2 projected points. With ownership at 46.9% and 13.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Marcus Tavernier at 6.0 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marcus Tavernier has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Cole Palmer leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Cole Palmer has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 28% for Cole Palmer and 14.3% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.2 expected points for Cole Palmer.
|
Priced at £4.7m and £6.2m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 10.4 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 22.9% and 18.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Virgil at 3.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Virgil has averaged 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Marcus Tavernier leads on total points and the gap stands at 33. On attacking output, Marcus Tavernier edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Marcus Tavernier has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 13.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai and 27.5% for Marcus Tavernier, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marcus Tavernier.
|
Priced at £4.7m and £6.4m, there is a £1.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 10.4 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 22.9% and 15.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Nicolas Jackson at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.2 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 7.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Nicolas Jackson has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.9% for James Tarkowski and 15.1% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.5 expected points for Virgil.
|
Priced at £5.6m and £7.0m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 7 against Nicolas Jackson at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Nicolas Jackson the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 7.6% and 25.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 2.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.5 for Kevin Schade, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kevin Schade is averaging 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 21. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 21.6% for Alexander Isak and 9.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Igor Thiago.
|
Priced at £4.2m and £6.0m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 8.6 against Marc Guéhi at 6.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Semi Ajayi the edge at 2.2 projected points. With ownership at 12.5% and 16% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Dominic Calvert-Lewin leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Dominic Calvert-Lewin edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 20.9% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 5.6% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.8 expected points for Dominic Calvert-Lewin.
|


Priced at £6.4m and £7.4m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Francisco Evanilson generates more points per million this season. Francisco Evanilson at 8.1 against Kai Havertz at 4.5. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Francisco Evanilson the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 17.8% and 5.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Igor Thiago at 5.5 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Igor Thiago has averaged 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW10. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.












