FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 19. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8% for Thierno Barry and 73.4% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £6.5m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 5 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.4 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 39.6% for Bruno Fernandes and 21.3% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £6.8m and £7.7m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4.3 against Morgan Rogers at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Martin Ødegaard the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 19.9% and 40.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Gibbs-White at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Gibbs-White has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Antoine Semenyo leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Antoine Semenyo edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Antoine Semenyo has 2 goals and 3 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.8% for Antoine Semenyo and 33.9% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Antoine Semenyo.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £4.6m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 6.5 against Ezri Konsa at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.4 projected points. With ownership at 26.2% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 6.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Morgan Gibbs-White, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 6.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Morgan Gibbs-White is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 26.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 16.3% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.6 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £6.0m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 3.1 against Marc Guéhi at 5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 22.9% and 18.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 8.6 for Gameweek 6, against 7.6 for Maxim De Cuyper, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 8.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Maxim De Cuyper is averaging 7.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 22% for Alexander Isak and 19% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £5.8m, there is a £2.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.5 against Pascal Groß at 8.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 9.4 projected points. With ownership at 15.8% and 25.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Virgil at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.4 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Virgil has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 2.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Antoine Semenyo leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Antoine Semenyo edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 19.9% for Martin Ødegaard and 14.8% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Antoine Semenyo.

|

Priced at £4.6m and £6.1m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 2.6 against James Tarkowski at 7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 8.6 projected points. With ownership at 19.4% and 14.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 6.2 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Virgil, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Dominic Calvert-Lewin the clear short-term pick. Dominic Calvert-Lewin carries 4.4 expected points and 4.4 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Priced at £7.6m and £9.1m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 2.5 against Alexander Isak at 3.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 8.5% and 22% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Yoane Wissa at 3.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Yoane Wissa has averaged 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 4 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.9% for Brian Brobbey and 22% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £7.6m and £6.2m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 2.5 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kai Havertz the edge at 3.8 projected points. With ownership at 8.5% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Brian Brobbey at 4.8 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Brian Brobbey has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8.5% for Kai Havertz and 9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.8 expected points for Kai Havertz.

|