FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 10

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.2 for Gameweek 10, against 3.8 for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, a gap of 3.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Dominic Calvert-Lewin is averaging 3.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Cole Palmer has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 5 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 28.2% for Cole Palmer and 52.7% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Morgan Rogers.

|

Priced at £6.2m and £6.6m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 9.7 against Marcus Tavernier at 8.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Marcus Tavernier the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 46.9% and 28% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 5.5 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 2.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 20. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 2 goals and 4 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 45.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 23.2% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 9.2 expected points for Ezri Konsa.

|

Priced at £5.4m and £6.2m, there is a £0.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 12.8 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 45.2% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 3.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.5 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 0.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 3.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Ezri Konsa leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.8% for Joško Gvardiol and 23.2% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 9.2 expected points for Ezri Konsa.

|

Priced at £6.4m and £7.0m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Francisco Evanilson generates more points per million this season. Francisco Evanilson at 8.1 against Nicolas Jackson at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Francisco Evanilson the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 18.5% and 26.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 16. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Gabriel has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 24.6% for Gabriel and 19.7% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £6.2m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 7.3 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 24.6% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 9.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 6.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 9.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marcus Tavernier leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Marcus Tavernier has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.2% for Kevin Schade and 28% for Marcus Tavernier, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marcus Tavernier.

|

Priced at £4.8m and £6.2m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 10.2 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 23.2% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Francisco Evanilson at 8.5 for Gameweek 10, against 5.0 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 3.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Francisco Evanilson has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 21. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Gabriel has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 24.6% for Gabriel and 15.8% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £6.4m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Gabriel generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 7.3 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 24.6% and 15% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for James Tarkowski, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while James Tarkowski is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 15.8% for Marc Guéhi and 19.7% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Lewis Hall.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £6.2m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 6.2 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 15.8% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 2.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.5 for Kevin Schade, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kevin Schade is averaging 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Francisco Evanilson leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Francisco Evanilson edges the combined goals and assists count with 8 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Francisco Evanilson has 4 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 7.7% for Thierno Barry and 18.5% for Francisco Evanilson, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Francisco Evanilson.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £6.0m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8 against Yoane Wissa at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Charalampos Kostoulas the edge at 4.2 projected points. With ownership at 10.2% and 9.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Igor Thiago at 5.5 for Gameweek 10, against 4.2 for Charalampos Kostoulas, a gap of 1.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Igor Thiago has averaged 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Charalampos Kostoulas is averaging 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|