FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 2

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; João Pedro has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 69% for Erling Haaland and 64% for João Pedro, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £15.5m, there is a £9.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 0.2 against Erling Haaland at 0.1. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 30.5% and 69% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has João Pedro at 2.4 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while João Pedro is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Dominik Szoboszlai leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Dominik Szoboszlai edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Christos Tzolis has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 42% for Dominik Szoboszlai and 25.4% for Christos Tzolis, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Dominik Szoboszlai.

|

Priced at £7.5m and £7.0m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Dominik Szoboszlai generates more points per million this season. Morgan Rogers at 0 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 1.1. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 2.6 projected points. With ownership at 24.3% and 42% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 2.5 for Gameweek 2, against 1.7 for Luke Shaw, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 9.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Luke Shaw is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Iliman Ndiaye leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Iliman Ndiaye edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Iliman Ndiaye has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 37.8% for Bryan Mbeumo and 16% for Iliman Ndiaye, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.

|

Priced at £5.5m and £8.0m, there is a £2.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 0.4 against Bryan Mbeumo at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 14% and 37.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 4.0 for Gameweek 2, against 2.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 5.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Christos Tzolis leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Christos Tzolis edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Declan Rice has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Christos Tzolis has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 17.9% for Declan Rice and 25.4% for Christos Tzolis, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.6 expected points for Declan Rice.

|

Priced at £6.5m and £6.5m, there is a £0.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Nico O'Reilly generates more points per million this season. Nico O'Reilly at 0.3 against Virgil at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Nico O'Reilly the edge at 3.1 projected points. With ownership at 21.4% and 19.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Ollie Watkins at 2.5 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Ollie Watkins is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Virgil leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Luke Shaw edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Luke Shaw has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 20.8% for Luke Shaw and 19.5% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 3.1 expected points for Virgil.

|

Priced at £5.0m and £4.5m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Harry Maguire generates more points per million this season. Harry Maguire at 0.2 against Luke Shaw at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Harry Maguire the edge at 2.2 projected points. With ownership at 17.9% and 20.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 2.8 for Gameweek 2, against 1.7 for Luke Shaw, a gap of 1.1 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Luke Shaw is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Dominic Calvert-Lewin leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Dominic Calvert-Lewin edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Jonah Kusi-Asare has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 30.5% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 7.4% for Jonah Kusi-Asare, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.0 expected points for Dominic Calvert-Lewin.

|

Priced at £4.0m and £6.5m, there is a £2.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Milan van Ewijk generates more points per million this season. Milan van Ewijk at 0.3 against Virgil at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 3.1 projected points. With ownership at 13.6% and 19.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 2.8 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Milan van Ewijk, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Milan van Ewijk is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Issa Diop leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Issa Diop edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.1% for Issa Diop and 12.3% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 1.7 expected points for Ezri Konsa.

|

Priced at £4.5m and £5.0m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Harry Maguire generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 0 against Harry Maguire at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Harry Maguire the edge at 2.2 projected points. With ownership at 12.3% and 17.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 2.7 for Gameweek 2, against 2.5 for Ollie Watkins, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Ollie Watkins is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Jonah Kusi-Asare leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Jonah Kusi-Asare edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Jonah Kusi-Asare has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.4% for Jonah Kusi-Asare and 17.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Igor Thiago.

|

Priced at £9.0m and £4.5m, there is a £4.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 0.2 against Jonah Kusi-Asare at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 2.7 projected points. With ownership at 17% and 7.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Ollie Watkins at 2.5 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Jonah Kusi-Asare, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Jonah Kusi-Asare has averaged 0.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Ollie Watkins is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Viktor Gyökeres has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8.4% for Viktor Gyökeres and 6.3% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.4 expected points for Viktor Gyökeres.

|