FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 2

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 4.0 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Dominic Calvert-Lewin is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Dominik Szoboszlai leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Dominik Szoboszlai edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Christos Tzolis has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 42% for Dominik Szoboszlai and 25.4% for Christos Tzolis, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Dominik Szoboszlai.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £6.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Christos Tzolis generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 0.3 against Christos Tzolis at 0.9. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 37.8% and 25.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 2.8 for Gameweek 2, against 2.6 for Morgan Rogers, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Morgan Rogers is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 1 assists this season; Luke Shaw has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 40.4% for Riccardo Calafiori and 20.8% for Luke Shaw, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £5.5m and £4.0m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 1.6 against Issa Diop at 0.5. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 40.4% and 18.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 2.5 for Gameweek 2, against 2.2 for Harry Maguire, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 9.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Harry Maguire is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Dominik Szoboszlai leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Dominik Szoboszlai edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Florian Wirtz has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 42% for Dominik Szoboszlai and 12.6% for Florian Wirtz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.6 expected points for Florian Wirtz.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £6.0m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Iliman Ndiaye generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 0.3 against Iliman Ndiaye at 1.5. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 37.8% and 16% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 2.8 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Pascal Groß, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Gabriel edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Luke Shaw has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 29.6% for Gabriel and 20.8% for Luke Shaw, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £7.5m and £8.5m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Antoine Semenyo generates more points per million this season. Morgan Rogers at 0 against Antoine Semenyo at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 2.9 projected points. With ownership at 24.3% and 25.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 2.6 for Gameweek 2, against 2.2 for Iliman Ndiaye, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Iliman Ndiaye has averaged 9.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Morgan Rogers is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Christos Tzolis leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Christos Tzolis edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Christos Tzolis has 0 goals and 1 assists this season; Florian Wirtz has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.4% for Christos Tzolis and 12.6% for Florian Wirtz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.6 expected points for Florian Wirtz.

|

Priced at £4.0m and £6.5m, there is a £2.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Issa Diop generates more points per million this season. Issa Diop at 0.5 against Virgil at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 3.1 projected points. With ownership at 18.1% and 19.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Virgil at 3.1 for Gameweek 2, against 2.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Issa Diop leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Issa Diop edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Harry Maguire has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.1% for Issa Diop and 17.9% for Harry Maguire, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.2 expected points for Harry Maguire.

|

Priced at £4.5m and £4.0m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Milan van Ewijk generates more points per million this season. Luke Shaw at 0.2 against Milan van Ewijk at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Luke Shaw the edge at 1.7 projected points. With ownership at 20.8% and 13.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 2.7 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 0.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Brian Brobbey has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Issa Diop leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Issa Diop edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.1% for Issa Diop and 12.3% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 1.7 expected points for Ezri Konsa.

|

Priced at £9.0m and £8.0m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 0.2 against Ollie Watkins at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 2.7 projected points. With ownership at 17% and 10.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Florian Wirtz at 2.6 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Pascal Groß, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Florian Wirtz is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 6.3% for Kai Havertz and 17.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Igor Thiago.

|

Priced at £7.5m and £9.0m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 0.8 against Alexander Isak at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 2.7 projected points. With ownership at 6.3% and 17% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Brian Brobbey at 2.0 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Jonah Kusi-Asare, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Brian Brobbey has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Jonah Kusi-Asare is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|