FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 2

Across the season, Dominic Calvert-Lewin leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Dominic Calvert-Lewin edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; João Pedro has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 30.5% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 64% for João Pedro, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.4 expected points for João Pedro.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £6.5m, there is a £5.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Christos Tzolis generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 0.2 against Christos Tzolis at 0.9. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.8% and 25.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 4.0 for Gameweek 2, against 2.6 for Morgan Rogers, a gap of 1.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Morgan Rogers is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Declan Rice leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Declan Rice has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 50.8% for Bruno Fernandes and 17.9% for Declan Rice, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £6.0m, there is a £6.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Iliman Ndiaye generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 0.2 against Iliman Ndiaye at 1.5. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.8% and 16% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 2.8 for Gameweek 2, against 2.6 for Morgan Rogers, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Morgan Rogers is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Iliman Ndiaye leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Iliman Ndiaye edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Iliman Ndiaye has 0 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 16% for Iliman Ndiaye and 42% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Dominik Szoboszlai.

|

Priced at £7.0m and £7.5m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Dominik Szoboszlai generates more points per million this season. Dominik Szoboszlai at 1.1 against Florian Wirtz at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Florian Wirtz the edge at 2.6 projected points. With ownership at 42% and 12.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 2.8 for Gameweek 2, against 2.6 for Florian Wirtz, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Florian Wirtz is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Issa Diop edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.1% for Issa Diop and 29.6% for Gabriel, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £8.5m, there is a £2.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Iliman Ndiaye generates more points per million this season. Iliman Ndiaye at 1.5 against Antoine Semenyo at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 2.9 projected points. With ownership at 16% and 25.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Nico O'Reilly at 3.1 for Gameweek 2, against 3.1 for Virgil, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Nico O'Reilly has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Issa Diop leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Issa Diop edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Nico O'Reilly has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.1% for Issa Diop and 21.4% for Nico O'Reilly, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 3.1 expected points for Nico O'Reilly.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £4.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 1.7 against Luke Shaw at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 17.6% and 20.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Virgil at 3.1 for Gameweek 2, against 2.2 for Harry Maguire, a gap of 0.9 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Virgil has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Harry Maguire is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.6% for Marc Guéhi and 19.5% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 3.1 expected points for Virgil.

|

Priced at £7.5m and £7.5m, there is a £0.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Florian Wirtz generates more points per million this season. Morgan Rogers at 0 against Florian Wirtz at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 2.6 projected points. With ownership at 24.3% and 12.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 1.7 for Gameweek 2, against 1.7 for Luke Shaw, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Luke Shaw has averaged 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 13.9% for Brian Brobbey and 17% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.7 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £4.5m and £5.0m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Harry Maguire generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 0 against Harry Maguire at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Harry Maguire the edge at 2.2 projected points. With ownership at 12.3% and 17.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Igor Thiago at 2.5 for Gameweek 2, against 2.5 for Ollie Watkins, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Igor Thiago has averaged 0.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Ollie Watkins is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Florian Wirtz has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14% for Pascal Groß and 12.6% for Florian Wirtz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.6 expected points for Florian Wirtz.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £8.0m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 0.3 against Ollie Watkins at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Ollie Watkins the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 13.9% and 10.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 2.7 for Gameweek 2, against 2.4 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Viktor Gyökeres has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8.4% for Viktor Gyökeres and 6.3% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.4 expected points for Viktor Gyökeres.

|